Alexandra Teague: A Poet You Should Know

by deborah on May 4, 2009

I’ll get to Alexandra Teague in a moment.

One of the pitfalls of how our culture is moving into disparate niches is that we’re reading work that’s different from our fellow poet. More often than not, I’ll ask another poet what they’re reading and find out that they’re not reading anything I’m reading.

If it’s bad, it’s bad because we have no common ground. It’s bad because we don’t have books informing our culture.

If it’s good, it’s good because we have no common ground. It’s good because we don’t have books informing our culture.

Today, I thought about how I might adore the work of a poet and no one else would be reading or talking about that person. One of these people is Alexandra Teague. I had the pleasure of reading her recent poems in The Missouri Review. I invite you to read some of her work on the web, and to look below for an excerpt. Click to read the rest.

What I Know For Sure

When I look at my abdomen, I see a scar turning
back to lighter skin from where a surgeon cut

five inches across, and just before this, I remember
trying to stop screaming as my intestine ruptured

by reciting names-first middle and last-
of everyone I could think of, though I do not know

for sure if I got all the middle names right,
or if I have ever known yours.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Netscape
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Facebook

{ 1 trackback }

Alexandra Teague Interview by Serena Agusto-Cox
June 22, 2009 at 3:20 pm

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Luke Johnson May 4, 2009 at 10:26 am

Thanks for sharing these. She has a great poem (“Adjectives of Order”) in Best New Poets 2008, too.

Lucy May 4, 2009 at 1:56 pm

In my MFA program, it feels like whenever anybody names what they’re reading, I don’t recognize about half the poets they name. As reader it feels discouraging, like being “well read” is an increasingly impossible goal; on the other hand, as a writer, it’s encouraging to think that there’s a way to be read and appreciated without being a Billy Collins-style smash-hit poet.

Thinking of finding common ground (which, as you point out, might not even be desirable) the hardest writers for me to read are those poets who fall somewhere between those who everybody reads, like Keats & Eliot, and brand-new, young, of the moment poets.

Writers in between those poles seem to fall between the cracks for me–poets like the recent poet laureates (Rita Dove, Mark Strand, Charles Simic), mid-century poets who are less popular than O’Hara & Berryman but seem just as influential (Kenneth Koch, Ron Padgett), or contemporary poets whose names I’ve just heard for a long time but have never read (Anthony Hecht, Dean Young, Les Murray). There are so many… !

The Storialist May 4, 2009 at 10:46 pm

What a twist in that last line!

I definitely agree that it’s great to hear what other writers are reading. Thanks for sharing this!

deborah May 4, 2009 at 11:24 pm

Luke,

I almost quoted from that poem. Thanks for letting everyone know about it.

Deborah

deborah May 4, 2009 at 11:25 pm

Lucy,

It’s easy to get overwhelmed. I’ve often felt like I’ve not read enough. The next step is to define “enough” for you. If we don’t do that, we won’t feel satisfied.

Thanks for commenting!

Deborah

Serena (Savvy Verse & Wit) May 6, 2009 at 10:33 am

Thanks for introducing Teague to us. I like the poems.

Leave a Comment